Tuition Culture: The Unequal Playing Field

Singapore's reputation for academic excellence is real. So is what it takes to keep up. Households spent SGD 1.8 billion on tuition in 2023 alone. For many students, private tuition has quietly stopped being a supplement and has become a prerequisite.

The problem is not that tuition exists, but what happens to students whose families cannot afford it. When enough of a class has already covered material through tutors before the teacher even introduces it, the pace of instruction shifts to accommodate them. Students without that foundation do not just fall behind. They are being taught in a system that has already calibrated itself around their better-prepared peers.

The students left behind are not failing individually. The system around them was built for someone else.

Some of that imbalance has been addressed. Changes to the PSLE scoring system and the Direct School Admission scheme both signal a move away from purely academic benchmarks. Remedial lessons cover part of the gap, though not all of it. Outside government, organisations such as Loving Heart Jurong and Happy Tutors have established free tuition services specifically for underprivileged students.

Project Reperio, under The Unspoken Policy, is built on this belief: it should not matter how much your parents can afford for academic support. Some things in the system are hard to move, and no individual effort will move them. That work belongs to policy. 

Previous
Previous

The Algorithm Decides Who Gets Heard

Next
Next

Can Books Break the Barriers?